---
- branch: netbsd-8
  date: Thu Nov  2 20:28:24 UTC 2017
  files:
  - new: 1.125.6.2
    old: 1.125.6.1
    path: src/sys/net/if_pppoe.c
    pathrev: src/sys/net/if_pppoe.c@1.125.6.2
    type: modified
  - new: 1.14.2.1
    old: '1.14'
    path: src/sys/net/if_pppoe.h
    pathrev: src/sys/net/if_pppoe.h@1.14.2.1
    type: modified
  - new: 1.169.6.1
    old: '1.169'
    path: src/sys/net/if_spppsubr.c
    pathrev: src/sys/net/if_spppsubr.c@1.169.6.1
    type: modified
  - new: 1.20.8.1
    old: '1.20'
    path: src/sys/net/if_spppvar.h
    pathrev: src/sys/net/if_spppvar.h@1.20.8.1
    type: modified
  id: 20171102T202824Z.a3b943261591bc3964e87729e8760570bb841021
  log: "Pull up following revision(s) (requested by knakahara in ticket #332):\n\tsys/net/if_pppoe.c:
    1.127-1.128\n\tsys/net/if_pppoe.h: 1.15\n\tsys/net/if_spppsubr.c: 1.170-1.171\n\tsys/net/if_spppvar.h:
    1.21-1.22\nIntegrate two locks used to protect PPPoE softc. Contributed by s-yamaguchi@IIJ.\nPPPOE_SESSION_LOCK
    protects variables used in PPP packet\nprocessing, on the other hand PPPOE_PARAM_LOCK
    protects\nthe other variables used to establish a PPPoE session id.\nThose locks
    isn't acquired in the same time because the\nPPP packet processing doesn't work
    without PPPoE session id.\nBy the reason, the locks can be integrated into PPPOE_LOCK.\nAdd
    locking notes later.\n--\nsppp_lock is changed from mutex to rwlock now. Contributed
    by s-yamaguchi@IIJ.\nAdd locking notes later.\n--\nAdd a locking notes for if_pppoe\n--\nAdd
    a locking notes for if_spppsubr\n--\nfix no INET6 build.\n"
  module: src
  subject: 'CVS commit: [netbsd-8] src/sys/net'
  unixtime: '1509654504'
  user: snj