---
- branch: MAIN
  date: Sat Apr  3 14:39:02 UTC 2021
  files:
  - new: '1.63'
    old: '1.62'
    path: src/usr.bin/make/hash.c
    pathrev: src/usr.bin/make/hash.c@1.63
    type: modified
  - new: '1.422'
    old: '1.421'
    path: src/usr.bin/make/job.c
    pathrev: src/usr.bin/make/job.c@1.422
    type: modified
  - new: '1.258'
    old: '1.257'
    path: src/usr.bin/make/make.h
    pathrev: src/usr.bin/make/make.h@1.258
    type: modified
  - new: '1.208'
    old: '1.207'
    path: src/usr.bin/make/nonints.h
    pathrev: src/usr.bin/make/nonints.h@1.208
    type: modified
  - new: '1.83'
    old: '1.82'
    path: src/usr.bin/make/str.c
    pathrev: src/usr.bin/make/str.c@1.83
    type: modified
  - new: '1.897'
    old: '1.896'
    path: src/usr.bin/make/var.c
    pathrev: src/usr.bin/make/var.c@1.897
    type: modified
  id: 20210403T143902Z.952055718881772e19d848d665f7c4533133e50b
  log: |
    make: backport to C90

    In the past few months I had accidentally used C99 features in the make
    code.  According to tools/README, tools that are used in the build
    system should restrict themselves to C90.

    This allows make to build with GCC's options "-pedantic
    -Wno-system-headers -Dinline= -Wno-error=cast-qual".

    I didn't notice anyone actively complaining though, I just wanted to see
    how much work this backporting would be.  The identifier __func__ is
    still used, as in other tools.

    No functional change.
  module: src
  subject: 'CVS commit: src/usr.bin/make'
  unixtime: '1617460742'
  user: rillig