Received: by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix, from userid 605) id CE1D884DFB; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:23:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2429084DEF for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:23:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netbsd.org Received: from mail.netbsd.org ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail.netbsd.org [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id LKmYzom9qmQL for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cvs.NetBSD.org (ivanova.netbsd.org [199.233.217.197]) by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC72584D33 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by cvs.NetBSD.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id A92A1FB40; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:23:40 +0000 From: "Maxime Villard" Subject: CVS commit: src/sys/net/npf To: source-changes@NetBSD.org X-Mailer: log_accum Message-Id: <20180313162340.A92A1FB40@cvs.NetBSD.org> Sender: source-changes-owner@NetBSD.org List-Id: source-changes.NetBSD.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: source-changes-d@NetBSD.org Mail-Reply-To: "Maxime Villard" Mail-Followup-To: source-changes-d@NetBSD.org List-Unsubscribe: Module Name: src Committed By: maxv Date: Tue Mar 13 16:23:40 UTC 2018 Modified Files: src/sys/net/npf: npf_inet.c Log Message: Mmh, put back the RFC6946 check (about dummy fragments), otherwise NPF is not happy in npf_reassembly, because NPC_IPFRAG is again returned after the packet was reassembled. I'm wondering whether it would not be better to just remove the fragment header in frag6_input directly. To generate a diff of this commit: cvs rdiff -u -r1.40 -r1.41 src/sys/net/npf/npf_inet.c Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the copyright notices on the relevant files.