[ TOP | Recently ]

1997-12-16 PIAFS on NetBSD/i386


昨日のつづき。

PIAFS で iij4u に繋げたときの log

環境
Machine:        HiNote Ultra II
OS:             NetBSD-current (12月10日ごろの)

PIAFS:          Paldio 321S
com.c:          wildboar の 321S パッチを参考に NetBSD のsys/dev/ic/com.c をいじって対応させたもの(昨日の記述参照)

CONNECT PROTOCOL:PIAFS COMPRESSION:V.42bis で接続

ryo@unlk:p4 ~ % ping 210.130.2.9
PING 210.130.2.9 (210.130.2.9): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=253 time=283.788 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=253 time=248.995 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=253 time=241.709 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=253 time=262.252 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=253 time=241.995 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=253 time=242.267 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=253 time=240.847 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=253 time=240.691 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=8 ttl=253 time=240.484 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=9 ttl=253 time=240.579 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=10 ttl=253 time=240.562 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=11 ttl=253 time=240.580 ms
^C
----210.130.2.9 PING Statistics----
12 packets transmitted, 12 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 240.484/247.062/283.788 ms

ftp: gzip圧縮ファイル           2.5〜2.8KB/sec
ftp: textファイル               6〜8KB/sec

CONNECT PROTOCOL:PIAFS COMPRESSION:NONE で接続

ryo@unlk:p4 ~ % ping 210.130.2.9
PING 210.130.2.9 (210.130.2.9): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=253 time=243.287 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=253 time=233.479 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=253 time=233.671 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=253 time=233.402 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=253 time=213.343 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=253 time=233.490 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=253 time=233.229 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=7 ttl=253 time=233.206 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=8 ttl=253 time=233.296 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=9 ttl=253 time=233.128 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=10 ttl=253 time=233.143 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=11 ttl=253 time=233.167 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=12 ttl=253 time=213.120 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=13 ttl=253 time=232.925 ms
64 bytes from 210.130.2.9: icmp_seq=14 ttl=253 time=232.705 ms
^C
----210.130.2.9 PING Statistics----
15 packets transmitted, 15 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 213.120/231.239/243.287 ms

ftp: gzip圧縮ファイル           2.9 KB/sec
ftp: textファイル               3.2 KB/sec      (お?)


結果

ping なんかは COMPRESSION:NONE のほうが遅延が少ない
なぜか COMPRESSION:NONE でも text が 3.2 KB/sec という謎な結果が出てしまった。
COMPRESSION:NONE では一回しかやんなかったからなんかのまちがいかも。

まぁ、総じて理論値の 2.9KB/sec は出ている。


EOF